CASE STUDIES / ORIGINATION · ANALYSIS · AUG 2024

Australia beats Middle East under demand skews.

Expanding a Sabine Pass to Gate base book with new supply and demand, then stress-testing Australian against Middle Eastern FOB length across demand swings, a Red Sea closure and seasonal spreads.

$238.4M

BASE PORTFOLIO PROFIT · SABINE PASS TO GATE

Read the full analysis (PDF) →27 PAGES · OPEN, NO GATE

The base book and two suitors.

01 · THE SETUP

The base book ships 22 Sabine Pass cargoes to Gate on two 174k vessels. It is expanded with a NWE DES-Long strip plus Portuguese and Korean demand, then offered four cargoes of new supply from either Australia or the Middle East.

BaseSABINE 22 → GATE 22 · 90% TTF
New legsNWE LONG 4 · SINES 4 · INCHEON 4
Option A · North West Shelf94.5% JKM - $3.75
Option B · Das Island11% BRENT

At the curve, a near tie.

02 · FIRST SIGHT

Adding the four new cargoes, both sources land within two percent of each other. First-sight P&L says the choice barely matters. The stress tests say otherwise.

PORTFOLIO P&L WITH NEW DEALS · $MFORWARD CURVES
With Australian supply$273.2M
With Middle East supply$268.0M

Demand skews pick Australia.

03 · STRESS

When demand shifts between Portugal and Korea, Australia wins most scenarios because it serves Korean demand better. A Red Sea closure costs the Australian book $4.6M and the Middle East book $3.9M whenever Europe is the heavy side.

Australian supply

Middle East supply

P&L UNDER DEMAND SKEW · $M6-VS-2 CARGO SPLITS
256.7
249.4
288.0
287.6

PORTUGAL-HEAVY

KOREA-HEAVY

One index towers over the rest.

04 · VOLATILITY

A one-standard-deviation move in TTF swings this book by over half a billion dollars, five times the Henry Hub range. JKM exposure is naturally hedged by the Korean leg. The seasonal JKM-Brent spread decides the winter winner.

TTF · 25% std dev$530.4M RANGE · HIGH
HH · 14% std dev$106.8M RANGE · MODERATE
JKM · 22% std dev$66.4M RANGE · LOW
Winter skew winnerMIDDLE EAST · $248.7M

05 · THE VERDICT

Australia wins most demand scenarios, the Middle East wins the winter skew, and TTF is the risk that towers over both.
BEST CASE $288.0MRED SEA HIT ≈ -$4.6MTTF RANGE $530.4MFLEET 2 x 174K + 1 TC

FORWARD CURVES HH/TTF/JKM/BRENT · DEMAND SKEWS AS 6-VS-2 SPLITS · STD DEVS YTD

THIS ANALYSIS RAN ON X-LNG

The whole analysis, priced inside the optimisation that plans your fleet.

X-LNG runs analyses like this on whole portfolios in seconds, so the answer sits in every netback, diversion and charter call rather than in a spreadsheet weeks later.

Explore X-LNG